Stupid IQ test

I will be on the road again.

This weeks “recent literature of interest ” is now available . Click here to view or download. Information regarding this feature, its basis, and the reasons for type of references included in each weekly installment can be found in a prior post .

Continued here: 
IQs Corner Recent Literature of Interest 02-26-10

Check it out at NASP convention next week.

This weeks “recent literature of interest ” is now available . Click here to view or download

Go here to see the original:
IQs Corner Recent Literature of Interest 02-21-10

I asked the following questions to some blog readers who recently took the LSAT: What do you know now that you wish you’d known before starting your LSAT prep? What would you have done differently?

Read the original:
LSAT Test-Taker Survey

“In press” in Intelligence. Wayne Silverman, Charles Miezejeski, Robert Ryan, Warren Zigman, Sharon Krinsky-McHale, Tiina Urv, Stanford-Binet and WAIS IQ differences and their implications for adults with intellectual disability (aka mental retardation), Intelligence, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 25 January 2010, ISSN 0160-2896, DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2009.12.005. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W4M-4Y7NJN8-1/2/c34f481640abfc9768fd15b536ddb286) Keywords: Intellectual disability; Intelligence testing; IQ Nash Unsworth, Interference control, working memory capacity, and cognitive abilities: A latent variable analysis, Intelligence, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 8 January 2010, ISSN 0160-2896, DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2009.12.003.

See the original post here:
IQ Pipeline 2-14-10: Articles "in press" in journal Intelligence

This weeks “recent literature of interest ” is now available . Click here to view or download.

Original post: 
IQs Corner Recent Literature of Interest 02-11-10

The Proposed Draft Revisions to DSM-5 are now available on line.  MR/ID is described as the following: Intellectual Disability A. Current intellectual deficits of two or more standard deviations below the population mean, which generally translates into performance in the lowest 3% of a person’s age and cultural group, or an IQ of 70 or below. This should be measured with an individualized, standardized, culturally appropriate, psychometrically sound measure

See the original post: 
DSM-5: Proposed draft revisions: Intellectual Disability

Stephen Greenspan (ANNALS OF GULLIBILITY, Praeger, 2009) is scheduled to appear on a

I should have included the following tables in my original AP101 Brief # 6 report re: my analysis of the CHC content of the FS IQ scores for the various editions of the WISC–WIS-IV/WAIS–WAIS-IV intelligence batteries.