Archive for the ‘Wechslers’ Category

IQ test selection could be life-or-death decision: WAIS v SB score differences in ID/MR sample

Monday, February 15th, 2010

Interesting article “in press” in Intelligence that compares WAIS and Stanford Binet IQ scores (across different editions except the current SB5 and WAIS-IV) for adults with intellectual disability (ID/MR).  Although the mixing together of scores across different editions makes it impossible to make SB/WAIS-specific edition comparisons, the finding that the WAIS scores were, on the average (mean), almost 17 points higher may surprise many psychologists.  The authors discuss the real-life implications (i.e., Atkins ID death penalty decisions; eligibility for SS benefits, etc.) of different scores from different tests.  As outlined in a prior IAP AP101 special report , differences of this magnitude between different IQ tests should not be surprising.  Silverman, W., Miezejeski, C., Ryan, R., Zigman, W., Krinsky-McHale & Urv, T.

Read the original:
IQ test selection could be life-or-death decision: WAIS v SB score differences in ID/MR sample

Dissertation dish: WISC-IV and WAIS-IV research dissertations during last 5 years

Sunday, February 14th, 2010

I ran a search of the ProQuest Digital Dissertation Database in search of studies involving the most recent versions of the WAIS-IV and WISC-IV .

AP101 Brief #6: Understanding Wechsler IQ score differences–the CHC evolution of the Wechsler FS IQ score

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

[Note.

AP101 Brief # 6b supplement: Summaries of Wechsler CHC test classifications

Sunday, February 7th, 2010

I should have included the following tables in my original AP101 Brief # 6 report re: my analysis of the CHC content of the FS IQ scores for the various editions of the WISC–WIS-IV/WAIS–WAIS-IV intelligence batteries.

Intellectual heterogeneity of MR/ID as evidence against AAIDD "stuck on g" green manual: Even in cleary genetic-based syndromes (Williams Syndrome)

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

In the l ast in my series of posts re: concerns I have with the AAIDD 11th Edition ID definition and classification manual , one

Weiss & Daniel respond to "Wechsler-like IQ scaled score metric…" post

Saturday, January 16th, 2010

Below is a response to my prior post regarding Wechsler-like scaled score issues.  The response was on the NASP listserv and the authors gave me permission to reproduce it “as is” below.  I’m pleased that they concur with the recommendations at the end of the paper post. Kevin McGrew’s argument can be turned around to show that using subtest score metrics with larger SDs also may lead to misinterpretation if a change of 1 raw score point leads to a change of many standard score points. So, the issue is not as simple as which subtest metric is better (e.g, the Wechsler / Kaufman metric or the WJ metric).

Read the rest here:
Weiss & Daniel respond to "Wechsler-like IQ scaled score metric…" post